Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

8 months ago

•View on X

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—–š—µš—²š—»š—»š—®š—¶: š—”š—¼ š—¦š—²š—æš˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š——š—²š—ŗš—®š—»š—± š—³š—¼š—æ š—„š—²š˜ƒš—²š—»š˜‚š—²-š—”š—²š˜‚š˜š—æš—®š—¹ š—¦š—¶š˜š˜‚š—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—» šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—æš—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: Service Tax demand was unsustainable as the advertising agency paid it, making the situation revenue-neutral. Appeal allowed.

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—”š—½š—½š—²š—¹š—¹š—®š—»š˜: M/s. Aniksha Productions Private Limited š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Was Service Tax on the fixed cost component correctly demanded from the appellant?

šŸ”‘ š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal held that the Service Tax paid by the advertising agency, undisputed by Revenue, entitled the appellant to CENVAT Credit. As this created a revenue-neutral situation with no actual revenue loss, the demand for Service Tax on the appellant was deemed unsustainable, and the appeal was allowed.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—æš—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s. Aniksha Productions Private Limited Vs The Commissioner of Service Tax š—¢š—æš—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 15 February 2023 šŸ“œ Revenue neutrality prevents Service Tax demands when intermediaries pay taxes. Proper documentation is crucial for appellants to strengthen their case.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on X

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own