Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

about 2 months ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—–š—µš—®š—»š—±š—¶š—“š—®š—暝—µ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—¦š—²š—暝˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—¼š—» š—¦š—œš—  š—®š—»š—± š—„š—²š—°š—µš—®š—暝—“š—² š—–š—®š—暝—±š˜€ šŸ“¢ Tš—µš—² š—§š—暝—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—暝˜‚š—¹š—²š—±: "When telecom operators pay Service Tax on the entire MRP of SIM and recharge cards, there is no additional Service Tax liability for distributors or franchisees selling these cards to the public."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: M/s S. R. Medical Agencies š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: The appellant, an authorized distributor for Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), was served a show-cause notice asserting that the commission and discount received from BSNL were taxable under "Business Auxiliary Service." The Commissioner confirmed the demand and imposed penalties.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that distributors of telecom SIM and recharge cards are not liable for additional Service Tax under "Business Auxiliary Service," as telecom operators like BSNL already pay tax on the entire MRP. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, dismissing further tax demands on such distributors.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—暝—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: Title: M/s S. R. Medical Agencies vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh-II š—¦š—²š—暝˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—”š—½š—½š—²š—®š—¹ š—”š—¼. 1789 Of 2011 š—¢š—暝—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 24 August 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling clarifies that telecom operators' payment of Service Tax on MRP shields their distributors from further Service Tax liabilities on SIM and recharge card sales.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own