Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

over 1 year ago

•View on š•

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—–š—µš—®š—»š—±š—¶š—“š—®š—æš—µ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—˜š˜…š—°š—¹š˜‚š˜€š—¶š—¼š—» š—¼š—³ š—§š——š—¦ š—³š—æš—¼š—ŗ š—šš—æš—¼š˜€š˜€ š—©š—®š—¹š˜‚š—² š—³š—¼š—æ š—¦š—²š—æš˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—–š—®š—¹š—°š˜‚š—¹š—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—» šŸ“¢ The Tribunal ruled: "The amount of TDS paid is not includable in the gross value for the purpose of payment of service tax."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: M/s ITD ITD Cem Joint Venture š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Whether TDS paid by the appellants should be included in the gross amount for the purpose of calculating service tax?

š—£š—æš—¼š—°š—²š—²š—±š—¶š—»š—“š˜€: A show-cause cum demand notice was issued on 02.09.2011, demanding service tax for the period 2008-09 to 2010-11. It was alleged that the appellants had not included the TDS amount in the gross value for discharging service tax under the Reverse Charge Mechanism. The demand was confirmed, and penalties were imposed.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that TDS paid is not includable in the gross value for service tax, citing similar decisions in the TVS Motor Company and Indian Additives Ltd. cases. No evidence of tax evasion was found, and the extended period was not invoked. The appeal was allowed.

š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—æš—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s ITD ITD Cem Joint Venture vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise, Rohtak š—¦š—²š—æš˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—”š—½š—½š—²š—®š—¹ š—”š—¼.55935 Of 2013 š—¢š—æš—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 30 January 2024

šŸ“œ This ruling clarifies that TDS payments made to foreign service providers should not be included in the gross value for service tax calculations.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on š•

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own