
Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024
over 1 year ago
ā¢View on š
ššš¦š§šš§ ššµš®š»š±š¶š“š®šæšµ š„šš¹š¶š»š“ š¼š» ššš”š©šš§ ššæš²š±š¶š š®š»š± šš®šš² šØšš¶š¹š¶šš®šš¶š¼š» š¢ The Tribunal ruled: "CENVAT credit cannot be denied solely because it was utilized late or not reflected in the ST-3 Returns."
š šš®š°šš: šš¼šŗš½š®š»š: M/s Antares Services Pvt. Ltd. ššššš²:Can the appellants take credit on invoices beyond the one-year permissible period?
š£šæš¼š°š²š²š±š¶š»š“š: A show-cause notice was issued, based on Income Tax Department data, alleging that the appellants failed to file ST-3 Returns from April 2014. The appellants claimed sufficient credit to pay service tax, but the Department contended they claimed credit on invoices beyond the one-year permissible period, resulting in the demand..
āļø ššš±š“š²šŗš²š»š: The Tribunal ruled that CENVAT credit cannot be denied solely due to late utilization or failure to reflect it in ST-3 Returns, as long as services were availed, tax was paid, and proper documentation existed. The show-cause notice lacked evidence of fraud or suppression, making the extended period inapplicable.
šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: M/s Antares Services Pvt. Ltd. vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh š¦š²šæšš¶š°š² š§š®š šš½š½š²š®š¹ š”š¼.60306 of 2022 [SM] š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 25 January 2024
š This ruling reinforces that procedural lapses do not invalidate the right to claim CENVAT credit, especially when the appellant possesses valid documentation and the service tax has been paid.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own