Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

about 2 months ago

โ€ขView on Twitter

๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—”๐—ง ๐—”๐—น๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐˜… ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—–๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—บ๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—ญ ๐—จ๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜๐˜€ ๐Ÿ“ข ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฑ: "Denial of the refund claim for services provided to an SEZ unit cannot be upheld simply because the services were not listed as specified services approved by the SEZ authority."

๐Ÿ” ๐—™๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€: ๐—–๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜†: M/s EXL Services SEZ BPO Solutions (P) Ltd. ๐—œ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฒ: The appellant, operating SEZ units in Noida and Jaipur, filed a refund claim for service tax paid on services used in SEZ-authorized operations from October to December 2010. The claim was denied because the services were not listed as specified services approved by the SEZ authority.

โš–๏ธ ๐—๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜: The Tribunal ruled that a refund cannot be denied solely because services werenโ€™t on the SEZ-approved list if the SEZ unit received them. Emphasizing proper notification and legality, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, citing constitutional principles and prior rulings that support SEZ tax exemptions.

๐Ÿ“œ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป: ๐—ง๐—ถ๐˜๐—น๐—ฒ: M/s EXL Services SEZ BPO Solutions (P) Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Noida ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐˜… ๐—”๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ก๐—ผ. 56769 of 2013 ๐—ข๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ: 30 August 2023 This ruling confirms that services received by SEZ units are eligible for a tax refund regardless of SEZ-approved specified services list inclusion.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own