
Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024
over 1 year ago
ā¢View on š
ššš¦š§šš§ šš¹š¹š®šµš®šÆš®š± š„šš¹š¶š»š“ š¼š» š¢š°š²š®š» ššæš²š¶š“šµš š§š®š š®šÆš¶š¹š¶šš š¢ The Tribunal held: "Ocean freight for goods imported under CIF contracts is not taxable under service tax."
š šš®š°šš: šš¼šŗš½š®š»š: M/s RGI Meditech Pvt. Ltd. šš°šš¶šš¶šš: The appellant initially paid service tax on ocean freight provided by a foreign supplier but later filed for a refund, claiming no service tax liability existed on ocean freight under reverse charge mechanism.
š£šæš¼š°š²š²š±š¶š»š“š: A show-cause notice was issued, proposing to reject the refund, arguing that the appellant was liable for service tax as the service recipient. āļø ššššš²: Whether the appellant is liable to pay service tax on ocean freight for goods imported under CIF contracts?
āļø ššš±š“š²šŗš²š»š: The Tribunal cited SAL Steel Ltd. v. Union of India (2020), holding that the appellant is not liable for service tax on ocean freight under CIF contracts. The plea that goods were imported under CIF contracts was not disputed by the revenue. Therefore, the appeal was allowed.
šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: M/s RGI Meditech Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Noida š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 04 December 2023 š¦š²šæšš¶š°š² š§š®š šš½š½š²š®š¹ š”š¼.70493 of 2020 š This ruling confirms that service tax on ocean freight is not applicable in cases of CIF contracts.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own