Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

over 1 year ago

•View on š•

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—”š—¹š—¹š—®š—µš—®š—Æš—®š—± š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—¢š—°š—²š—®š—» š—™š—æš—²š—¶š—“š—µš˜ š—§š—®š˜…š—®š—Æš—¶š—¹š—¶š˜š˜† šŸ“¢ The Tribunal held: "Ocean freight for goods imported under CIF contracts is not taxable under service tax."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: M/s RGI Meditech Pvt. Ltd. š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š˜†: The appellant initially paid service tax on ocean freight provided by a foreign supplier but later filed for a refund, claiming no service tax liability existed on ocean freight under reverse charge mechanism.

š—£š—æš—¼š—°š—²š—²š—±š—¶š—»š—“š˜€: A show-cause notice was issued, proposing to reject the refund, arguing that the appellant was liable for service tax as the service recipient. āš–ļø š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Whether the appellant is liable to pay service tax on ocean freight for goods imported under CIF contracts?

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal cited SAL Steel Ltd. v. Union of India (2020), holding that the appellant is not liable for service tax on ocean freight under CIF contracts. The plea that goods were imported under CIF contracts was not disputed by the revenue. Therefore, the appeal was allowed.

š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—æš—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s RGI Meditech Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Noida š—¢š—æš—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 04 December 2023 š—¦š—²š—æš˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—”š—½š—½š—²š—®š—¹ š—”š—¼.70493 of 2020 šŸ“œ This ruling confirms that service tax on ocean freight is not applicable in cases of CIF contracts.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on š•

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own