Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024
3 months ago
ššš¦š§šš§ šš¹š¹š®šµš®šÆš®š± š„šš¹š¶š»š“ š¼š» ššš”š©šš§ ššæš²š±š¶š š®š»š± š„š²š³šš»š± š£šæš¼š°š²š²š±š¶š»š“š š¢ The Tribunal held: "CENVAT credit cannot be denied during refund proceedings without initiating proceedings under Rule 14 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, and a cash refund is allowed under Section 142 of the CGST Act."
š šš®š°šš: šš¼šŗš½š®š»š: M/s Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. ššššš²: Whether the appellant is entitled to a refund of CENVAT credit?
šš°šš¶šš¶šš: The appellant filed a refund claim for accumulated CENVAT credit on input services under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The refund was partially disallowed, citing inadmissible input services (unregistered premises and pantry services).
āļø ššš±š“š²šŗš²š»š: The Tribunal ruled that CENVAT credit cannot be denied during refund proceedings without initiating proceedings under Rule 14 of the CENVAT Credit Rules. The entire credit availed during the relevant period must be considered for refund, and the appellant is entitled to a cash refund under Section 142 of the CGST Act. Appeal allowed.
šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: M/s Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Noida š¦š²šæšš¶š°š² š§š®š šš½š½š²š®š¹ š”š¼.54484 of 2014 š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 27 September 2023
š This ruling clarifies that without proper proceedings under Rule 14, CENVAT credit cannot be denied during refund claims, and the appellant is entitled to a cash refund under the CGST Act.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own