Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

3 months ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—”š—¹š—¹š—®š—µš—®š—Æš—®š—± š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—–š—˜š—”š—©š—”š—§ š—–š—暝—²š—±š—¶š˜ š—®š—»š—± š—„š—²š—³š˜‚š—»š—± š—£š—暝—¼š—°š—²š—²š—±š—¶š—»š—“š˜€ šŸ“¢ The Tribunal held: "CENVAT credit cannot be denied during refund proceedings without initiating proceedings under Rule 14 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, and a cash refund is allowed under Section 142 of the CGST Act."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: M/s Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Whether the appellant is entitled to a refund of CENVAT credit?

š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š˜†: The appellant filed a refund claim for accumulated CENVAT credit on input services under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The refund was partially disallowed, citing inadmissible input services (unregistered premises and pantry services).

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that CENVAT credit cannot be denied during refund proceedings without initiating proceedings under Rule 14 of the CENVAT Credit Rules. The entire credit availed during the relevant period must be considered for refund, and the appellant is entitled to a cash refund under Section 142 of the CGST Act. Appeal allowed.

š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—暝—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Noida š—¦š—²š—暝˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—”š—½š—½š—²š—®š—¹ š—”š—¼.54484 of 2014 š—¢š—暝—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 27 September 2023

šŸ“œ This ruling clarifies that without proper proceedings under Rule 14, CENVAT credit cannot be denied during refund claims, and the appellant is entitled to a cash refund under the CGST Act.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own
An error occurred, please try again