Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

3 months ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—”š—µš—ŗš—²š—±š—®š—Æš—®š—± š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—Ŗš—®š˜š—²š—æ š—™š—暝—¼š—»š˜ š—„š—¼š˜†š—®š—¹š˜š˜† š—®š—»š—± š—¦š—²š—暝˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—Ÿš—¶š—®š—Æš—¶š—¹š—¶š˜š˜† šŸ“¢ The Tribunal held: "Water front royalty collected as per the Maritime Board Act, 1981, on behalf of the State of Gujarat is a statutory levy, not a service, and therefore is not subject to service tax."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: State Charges Gog Jafrabad Port š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Whether service tax is applicable on water front royalty for the period from 2006-07 to 2009-10? š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š˜†: The appellant paid service tax on water front royalty charges but was alleged by the department to have not paid service tax for the period 2006-07 to 2009-10.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that water front royalty collected by the Maritime Board is a statutory levy under Section 22A of the Maritime Board Act, 1981, per relevant circulars. As the appellant merely facilitates port operations without providing direct services, service tax does not apply. The appeal was allowed.

š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—暝—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: State Charges Gog Jafrabad Port vs. C.C.E. & S.T.-Bhavnagar š—¦š—˜š—„š—©š—œš—–š—˜ š—§š—”š—« š—”š—½š—½š—²š—®š—¹ š—”š—¼. 11110 of 2013-DB š—¢š—暝—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 06 November 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling confirms that water front royalty collected under statutory authority is not liable to service tax.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own