Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

about 20 hours ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—”š—µš—ŗš—²š—±š—®š—Æš—®š—± š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—¦š—¼š—³š˜š˜„š—®š—暝—² š—Ÿš—¼š—®š—±š—²š—± š—¼š—» š— š—²š—±š—¶š˜‚š—ŗ š—•š—²š—¶š—»š—“ š—§š—暝—²š—®š˜š—²š—± š—®š˜€ š—šš—¼š—¼š—±š˜€ šŸ“¢ The Tribunal held: "Software supplied on a medium like USB/CD/Hard Drive is considered goods, not services, and hence, service tax cannot be demanded."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: Edukite Software Pvt Ltd š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Whether the appellant is liable to discharge service tax on software supplied via a medium?

š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š˜†: The appellant was accused of not discharging service tax on software supplied to M/s. Attano Media and Education Private Limited. The software was loaded onto a medium like USB/CD/Hard Drive.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled: Following the Quick Heal Technologies Ltd. decision, software loaded on a medium is considered goods and not services. Therefore, the demand for service tax was unsustainable, as the software in question was sold, not serviced. The appeal was allowed, and the demand was set aside.

š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—暝—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: Edukite Software Pvt Ltd vs. C.C.E. & S.T.-Vadodara-I š—¦š—²š—暝˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—”š—½š—½š—²š—®š—¹ š—”š—¼. 12040 of 2016-DB š—¢š—暝—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 06 December 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling reinforces that software loaded on a physical medium is treated as a sale of goods, not a service, and is not subject to service tax.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own