Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

8 months ago

•View on X

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—”š—µš—ŗš—²š—±š—®š—Æš—®š—± š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—¦š—²š—æš˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—¼š—» š—Ŗš—¼š—æš—øš˜€ š—–š—¼š—»š˜š—æš—®š—°š˜ š—¦š—²š—æš˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—æš—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: "Thermal insulation involving supply and use of insulating material, with VAT paid, qualifies as 'Works Contract Service' and is exempt from Service Tax."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: Rudra Engineering š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Whether abatement of 67% was wrongly availed and if thermal insulation was wrongly classified as "Works Contract Service." š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š˜†: The appellant supplied insulating materials, used them for thermal insulation, and paid VAT. A show cause notice demanded Service Tax, alleging wrong classification and abatement.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal affirmed that Notification No. 1/2006-S.T., dated 1-3-2006 applies to materials beyond plant, machinery, or equipment. The appellant provided taxable services while also paying VAT on insulating materials. The activity meets the definition of "Works Contract Service," making Service Tax non-applicable. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the demands and penalties.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—æš—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: Rudra Engineering vs. C.C.E. & S.T.-Vadodara-I š—¢š—æš—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 16 January 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling reinforces that thermal insulation activities involving material supply and VAT payment fall under "Works Contract Service," exempting them from Service Tax.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on X

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own