Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

about 1 year ago

•View on X

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—”š—µš—ŗš—²š—±š—®š—Æš—®š—± š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—¦š—²š—æš˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—¼š—» š—¦š—¼š—³š˜š˜„š—®š—æš—² š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—» š—–š—µš—®š—æš—“š—²š˜€ šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—æš—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: "Activation charges for equipment/software features are part of the sale of goods, covered by VAT, and not subject to Service Tax under the category of 'Business Auxiliary Services'."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: Black Box Limited š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Whether activation charges for software are taxable as 'Business Auxiliary Services' under Section 65 of the Finance Act. š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š˜†: The appellant collected activation charges from customers for after-sales software/equipment services. Show cause notices were issued, claiming Service Tax liability.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that the activation charges were part of the sale of goods, which had VAT applied, and were not services under the Act. The appellant was selling goods, not providing a service, and no service tax was applicable. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the demand.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—æš—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: Black Box Limited vs. Commissioner of Central Excise & ST, Ahmedabad-III š—¢š—æš—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 04 January 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling clarifies that software activation charges, when part of the sale of goods, are not subject to Service Tax.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on X

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own