Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

8 months ago

โ€ขView on X

๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—”๐—ง ๐—”๐—ต๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐˜… ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐——๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—–๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐Ÿ“ข ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฑ: "Amounts received as development charges are in the form of profit and do not fall under 'Real Estate Agentโ€™s Service,' making them not liable for service tax."

๐Ÿ” ๐—™๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€: ๐—–๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜†: J P Infrastructure Pvt Ltd ๐—œ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฒ: Whether the appellant is liable for service tax under the category of "Real Estate Agentโ€™s Service" for development charges received. ๐—”๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜†: The appellant received โ‚น3.39 crores as development charges; service tax demands with penalties were issued for non-registration and non-payment.

โš–๏ธ ๐—๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜: The Tribunal ruled that the appellant acted as a project developer, not a real estate agent, and the received charges were profits, not service fees. Service tax liability depends on the nature of services and contract interpretation. Citing Safal Construction Pvt. Ltd., the appellantโ€™s activities were exempt from "Real Estate Agentโ€™s Service."

๐Ÿ“œ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป: ๐—ง๐—ถ๐˜๐—น๐—ฒ: J P Infrastructure Pvt Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise โ€“ Service Tax ๐—ข๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ: 12 December 2022 ๐Ÿ“œ This ruling clarifies that profits from development agreements are not taxable under "Real Estate Agentโ€™s Service."

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on X

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own