Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

2 months ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—”š—µš—ŗš—²š—±š—®š—Æš—®š—± š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—¦š—²š—暝˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—Ÿš—¶š—®š—Æš—¶š—¹š—¶š˜š˜† š—³š—¼š—æ š—•š—®š—»š—øš—¶š—»š—“ š—–š—µš—®š—暝—“š—²š˜€ šŸ“¢ The bench of CESTAT Ahmedabad stated,

For the liability of Service Tax on banking charges deducted by foreign banks, it is the Indian bank that is liable, not the assessee.

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: GRP Limited š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Whether GRP Limited is liable to pay Service Tax on foreign bank charges.

š—£š—暝—¼š—°š—²š—²š—±š—¶š—»š—“š˜€: GRP Limited received a show cause notice demanding Service Tax on foreign bank charges. The Assessing Officer confirmed the demand, but GRP Limited appealed.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal observed that GRP Limited had no direct dealing or contract with the foreign bank. The liability for Service Tax lies with the Indian bank, not GRP Limited. The demand was deemed unsustainable, and the appeal was allowed on June 5, 2024.

š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—暝—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: GRP Limited vs. Commissioner of Central Excise & ST, Bharuch š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—”š—¼: SERVICE TAX Appeal No. 11709 of 2016-DB

šŸ“œ This ruling clarifies that Service Tax liability for foreign banking charges falls on the Indian bank involved, not the recipient company. #CESTAT #ServiceTax #LegalUpdate #BankingCharges

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own