Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

over 1 year ago

•View on š•

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—”š—µš—ŗš—²š—±š—®š—Æš—®š—± š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—¦š—²š—æš˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—®š—»š—± š—¦š—¼š—³š˜š˜„š—®š—æš—² š—¦š—²š—æš˜ƒš—¶š—°š—²š˜€ šŸ“¢ The Tribunal ruled:

"Non-payment of service tax under reverse charge on software services is a revenue-neutral situation as ITC is available."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: Emerson Process Management I Pvt. Ltd š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—² š—„š—®š—¶š˜€š—²š—±: Emerson Process Management paid service tax on some services under reverse charge for a contract with M/s Fisher Rosemount System but excluded software services, leading to a Department allegation of underpayment on 50% of the invoice.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that the appellant's non-payment of service tax on software services was due to a bona fide belief, with no suppression of facts. As the case was revenue-neutral and time-barred, the appeal was allowed.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—æš—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: Emerson Process Management I Pvt. Ltd vs. C.C.E. & S.T.-Daman š—¦š—²š—æš˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—”š—½š—½š—²š—®š—¹ š—”š—¼. 10596 of 2014 - DB š—¢š—æš—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 19 February 2024

This ruling clarifies that in cases of revenue neutrality, service tax demands should not be confirmed if the taxpayer is eligible for input tax credit.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on š•

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own