Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

12 months ago

•View on X

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—”š—µš—ŗš—²š—±š—®š—Æš—®š—± š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—„š—²š—³š˜‚š—»š—± š—¼š—³ š—¦š—²š—æš˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—³š—¼š—æ š—˜š˜…š—½š—¼š—æš˜ š—¦š—²š—æš˜ƒš—¶š—°š—²š˜€ šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—æš—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: "The denial of refund on the basis of failure to produce original invoices is a procedural lapse. Certified copies are sufficient unless in-depth inquiries are required as per CBIC circular."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: Welspun Global Ltd. š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Whether the appellant is entitled to a refund despite not producing original invoices for Foreign Agent Commission services and CHA services. š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š˜†: Filed a refund claim for Service Tax paid under Business Auxiliary Service on reverse charge, which was denied for procedural reasons.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal referenced M/s. VST Industries Ltd. and emphasized that procedural lapses, such as failure to produce original invoices, can be condoned. Refunds on Foreign Agent Commission are allowed. For CHA services, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order, stating it contradicted CBIC Circular guidance. The matter was remanded for verification as per CBIC Circular.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—æš—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: Welspun Global Ltd. vs. C.C.E. & S.T., Rajkot š—¢š—æš—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 12 January 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling underscores that technical lapses like the absence of original invoices should not deny rightful refunds, aligning with CBIC procedural guidance.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on X

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own