Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

12 months ago

•View on X

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—”š—µš—ŗš—²š—±š—®š—Æš—®š—± š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—”š—¦š——š—Ÿ/š—–š——š—¦š—Ÿ š—–š—µš—®š—æš—“š—²š˜€ š—®š—»š—± š—¦š—²š—æš˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—æš—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: "NSDL/CSDL charges, being statutory charges as per SEBI Rules, should not be included in the assessable value for the purpose of service tax."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: Saurin Investments Pvt. Ltd. š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Whether NSDL & CSDL charges recovered from clients should be included in the assessable value for service tax purposes. š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š˜†: The appellant recovered NSDL/CSDL charges from clients and excluded them from the assessable value of service tax.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal relied on precedents like M/s. Kunvarji Finstock Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. Innovative Securities Pvt. Ltd., which ruled that demat charges collected and paid to depositories like CDSL/NSDL are statutory in nature and cannot be taxed. It was held that such charges do not form part of the assessable value for service tax. Accordingly, the appeal was allowed, and the impugned orders were set aside.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—æš—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: Saurin Investments Pvt. Ltd. vs. C.S.T.-Service Tax, Ahmedabad š—¢š—æš—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 10 January 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling reaffirms that statutory charges like NSDL/CSDL, governed by SEBI rules, are not taxable under service tax provisions.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on X

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own