
Abhishek Raja "Ram"
12 months ago
ā¢View on X
ššš¦š§šš§ ššµšŗš²š±š®šÆš®š± š„šš¹š¶š»š“ š¼š» š”š¦šš/ššš¦š ššµš®šæš“š²š š®š»š± š¦š²šæšš¶š°š² š§š®š š¢ š§šµš² š§šæš¶šÆšš»š®š¹ šµš²š¹š±: "NSDL/CSDL charges, being statutory charges as per SEBI Rules, should not be included in the assessable value for the purpose of service tax."
š šš®š°šš: šš¼šŗš½š®š»š: Saurin Investments Pvt. Ltd. ššššš²: Whether NSDL & CSDL charges recovered from clients should be included in the assessable value for service tax purposes. šš°šš¶šš¶šš: The appellant recovered NSDL/CSDL charges from clients and excluded them from the assessable value of service tax.
āļø ššš±š“š²šŗš²š»š: The Tribunal relied on precedents like M/s. Kunvarji Finstock Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. Innovative Securities Pvt. Ltd., which ruled that demat charges collected and paid to depositories like CDSL/NSDL are statutory in nature and cannot be taxed. It was held that such charges do not form part of the assessable value for service tax. Accordingly, the appeal was allowed, and the impugned orders were set aside.
š šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: Saurin Investments Pvt. Ltd. vs. C.S.T.-Service Tax, Ahmedabad š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 10 January 2023 š This ruling reaffirms that statutory charges like NSDL/CSDL, governed by SEBI rules, are not taxable under service tax provisions.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own