Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024
23 days ago
ššš¦š§šš§ ššµšŗš²š±š®šÆš®š± š„šš¹š¶š»š“ š¼š» šš®šš¶š»š“ š¼š³ šØš»š±š²šæš“šæš¼šš»š± šš®šÆš¹š²š š¢ š§šµš² š§šæš¶šÆšš»š®š¹ šµš²š¹š±: "Laying of underground cables is not subject to service tax as per CBIC Circular No. 123/05/2010-ST. The demand for service tax is not sustainable."
š šš®š°šš: šš¼šŗš½š®š»š: Siddharth Industries ššššš²: Whether the appellant is eligible for exemption under Notification No. 1/2006-ST dated 01.03.2006? šš°šš¶šš¶šš: The appellant was involved in laying underground cables but was denied exemption under Notification No. 1/2006-ST, alleging non-eligibility due to not providing equipment during the installation process.
āļø ššš±š“š²šŗš²š»š: The Tribunal ruled that laying of underground cables is not liable to service tax, relying on the Rishabh Telelinks case and CBIC Circular No. 123/05/2010-ST. The appellant's activity falls outside the service tax scope. The appeal was allowed, and the demand was set aside.
š šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: Siddharth Industries vs. C.C.E. & S.T.-Vadodara-I š¦š²šæšš¶š°š² š§š®š šš½š½š²š®š¹ š”š¼.11718 of 2013 š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 20 April 2023 š This ruling reinforces that underground cable laying activities are exempt from service tax as per CBIC guidelines.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own