Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

about 2 months ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—”š—µš—ŗš—²š—±š—®š—Æš—®š—± š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—šš—¼š—¼š—±š˜€ š—§š—暝—®š—»š˜€š—½š—¼š—暝˜ š—”š—“š—²š—»š—°š˜† (š—šš—§š—”) š—§š—®š˜… š—Ÿš—¶š—®š—Æš—¶š—¹š—¶š˜š˜† šŸ“¢ Tš—µš—² š—§š—暝—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: "Service tax is not applicable to the appellant, as it did not issue consignment notes for the transportation services provided, and such activities fall under the Negative List."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: Chartered Logistics Limited. š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Whether the appellant is liable to pay service tax under GTA. š—¦š—²š—暝˜ƒš—¶š—°š—²: The appellant provided transportation services to M/s FCPL and M/s Reliance Supply Chain Solution Ltd. without issuing consignment notes, which were instead issued by M/s FCPL.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that service tax is not applicable to the appellant since no consignment notes were issued, placing the service under the "Negative List" (Section 66D). M/s FCPL, the actual GTA, holds any tax liability, if due, for M/s Reliance Industries. Extended limitation was deemed inapplicable.

š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: Chartered Logistics Limited vs. C.C.E - Ahmedabad-II š—¦š—²š—暝˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—”š—½š—½š—²š—®š—¹ š—”š—¼. 10857 of 2022- DB š—¢š—暝—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 19 July 2023 šŸ“œ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“: The Tribunal set aside the demand, ruling in favor of the appellant. The appeal was allowed.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own