Abhishek Raja "Ram"
5 days ago
ššš¦š§šš§ ššµšŗš²š±š®šÆš®š± š„šš¹š¶š»š“ š¼š» šš¶š¹š¶š»š“ š„š²š³šš»š± šŖš¶ššµš¶š» šš¶šŗš¶šš®šš¶š¼š» š£š²šæš¶š¼š± š¢ š§šµš² š§šæš¶šÆšš»š®š¹ šµš²š¹š±: "The one-year limitation for filing a refund claim does not apply if the duty was paid under protest."
š šš®š°šš: šš¼šŗš½š®š»š: M/s Erweka India ššššš²: Whether the one-year limitation for filing a refund applies when the duty is paid under protest? šš°šš¶šš¶šš: The appellant, an exporter, paid service tax under protest, believing their services were not taxable. Despite this, their refund claim was rejected as time-barred.
āļø ššš±š“š²šŗš²š»š: The Tribunal ruled that under Section 11B(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, the one-year limitation for filing a refund claim does not apply if duty is paid under protest. The protest letter from 25.06.2007 was valid and should have been considered. The appeal was remanded for reconsideration.
š šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: M/s Erweka India vs. Commissioner of Central Excise & ST, Ahmedabad š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 23 March 2023 š This ruling clarifies that if service tax is paid under protest, the one-year time limit for filing a refund claim does not apply.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own