Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

about 1 month ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—”š—µš—ŗš—²š—±š—®š—Æš—®š—± š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—˜š˜…š—½š—¼š—暝˜ š—¦š—²š—暝˜ƒš—¶š—°š—²š˜€ š—®š—»š—± š—„š—²š—³š˜‚š—»š—± š—–š—¹š—®š—¶š—ŗš˜€ šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—暝—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: "Services consumed outside India are not taxable. Any amount deposited in such cases is not service tax and is refundable."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: Aegis Limited š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Whether the refund rejection due to non-fulfillment of convertible foreign exchange requirements was justified. š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š˜†: The appellant provided consulting engineering services to M/s Minnesota Steel Industries, USA, which were consumed outside India.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that services provided and consumed outside India are non-taxable under the Finance Act, 1994. Refund claims cannot be rejected as premature due to pending foreign exchange receipts. Deposited amounts, not considered service tax, must be refunded. The appeal was allowed, and the refund was sanctioned.

š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—暝—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: Aegis Limited vs. Commissioner of Central Excise & ST, Surat-I š—¦š—˜š—„š—©š—œš—–š—˜ š—§š—”š—« š—”š—½š—½š—²š—®š—¹ š—”š—¼. 13528 of 2013-DB š—¢š—暝—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 09 June 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling reinforces that export services consumed outside India are non-taxable and refunds cannot be denied on procedural grounds like pending foreign exchange receipts.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own