Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

about 1 month ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—”š—µš—ŗš—²š—±š—®š—Æš—®š—± š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š——š—²š—ŗš—®š—»š—± š—•š—®š˜€š—²š—± š—¼š—» šŸ®šŸ²š—”š—¦ š——š—®š˜š—® šŸ“¢ š—§š—暝—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“: "Without an independent inquiry or investigation, Service Tax demand cannot be sustained solely on the basis of '26AS data' provided by Income Tax authorities."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: Shree Kankeshwari Enterprise š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Whether the Service Tax demand confirmed with interest and penalties, based solely on 26AS data, is sustainable without an independent inquiry.

šŸ“ š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that Service Tax demands cannot rely solely on 26AS data from Income Tax records, as it lacks exemption details. Without independent investigation or verification, demands are unsustainable. Since the appellant provided necessary documentation showing eligibility for exemptions, the Tribunal dismissed the demand, interest, and penalties.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—暝—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: Shree Kankeshwari Enterprise vs. Commissioner of Central Excise & ST, Bhavnagar š—¦š—˜š—„š—©š—œš—–š—˜ š—§š—”š—« š—”š—½š—½š—²š—®š—¹ š—”š—¼. 10921 of 2022-DB š—¢š—暝—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 28 June 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling reinforces that authorities must conduct proper investigations rather than relying solely on data from other departments when issuing tax demands.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own