Abhishek Raja "Ram"
8 months ago
ā¢View on X
ššš¦š§šš§ ššµšŗš²š±š®šÆš®š± š„šš¹š¶š»š“ š¼š» šš¹š¼šš¶š»š“ šš®š¹š®š»š°š² š¼š³ šš²š»šš®š ššæš²š±š¶š š¢ š§šµš² š§šæš¶šÆšš»š®š¹ šµš²š¹š±: "No tax demand can be sustained if the correct closing balance of Cenvat Credit is declared in the books and supported by valid invoices."
š šš®š°šš: šš¼šŗš½š®š»š: Industrial Extension Bureau ššššš²: Whether the appellant is liable for tax demand due to discrepancies in Cenvat Credit closing balances. šš°šš¶šš¶šš: The appellant declared a closing balance of ā¹1,19,12,078/- in their accounts, but the ST-3 return showed ā¹1,01,53,009/-. A demand was raised and upheld by the Commissioner.
āļø ššš±š“š²šŗš²š»š: The Tribunal found that the declared balance of ā¹31,67,294/- was validly supported by invoices, proving eligibility for Cenvat Credit. The appeal was allowed, and consequential relief granted.
š šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: Industrial Extension Bureau vs. C.S.T. ā Service Tax Ahmedabad š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 19 January 2023 š This ruling emphasizes that valid documentation is key to proving Cenvat Credit entitlement.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own