Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

over 1 year ago

•View on š•

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—”š—µš—ŗš—²š—±š—®š—Æš—®š—± š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—–š—¹š—²š—®š—»š—¶š—»š—“ š—¦š—²š—æš˜ƒš—¶š—°š—²š˜€ š—½š—æš—¼š˜ƒš—¶š—±š—²š—± š˜š—¼ š—„š—®š—¶š—¹š˜„š—®š˜†š˜€

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—”š—½š—½š—²š—¹š—¹š—®š—»š˜: Prabhakar Enterprises š—¦š—²š—æš˜ƒš—¶š—°š—²š˜€ š—£š—æš—¼š˜ƒš—¶š—±š—²š—±: Prabhakar Enterprises provided cleaning and manpower services to Indian Railways, Airport Authority, and SEZ units. A show-cause notice led to service tax demands, with some dropped and others confirmed.

āš–ļø š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Is the appellant liable for service tax on services provided to railways, and can the extended limitation period be invoked?

šŸ“œ š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that service tax is payable for cleaning services to railways, invalidated the Commissioner's decision, deemed extended limitation inapplicable, and affirmed the inclusion of service tax in the gross amount.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—æš—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: Prabhakar Enterprises vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Bharuch š—¦š—²š—æš˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—”š—½š—½š—²š—®š—¹ š—”š—¼. 11916 of 2016 š—¢š—æš—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 24 January 2024

This ruling clarifies the tax liability for cleaning services provided to Indian Railways and addresses issues related to the limitation period and the gross amount charged, including service tax.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on š•

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own