
Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024
over 1 year ago
ā¢View on š
ššš¦š§šš§ ššµšŗš²š±š®šÆš®š± š„šš¹š¶š»š“ š¼š» šš¹š²š®š»š¶š»š“ š¦š²šæšš¶š°š²š š½šæš¼šš¶š±š²š± šš¼ š„š®š¶š¹šš®šš
š šš®š°šš: šš½š½š²š¹š¹š®š»š: Prabhakar Enterprises š¦š²šæšš¶š°š²š š£šæš¼šš¶š±š²š±: Prabhakar Enterprises provided cleaning and manpower services to Indian Railways, Airport Authority, and SEZ units. A show-cause notice led to service tax demands, with some dropped and others confirmed.
āļø ššššš²: Is the appellant liable for service tax on services provided to railways, and can the extended limitation period be invoked?
š ššš±š“šŗš²š»š: The Tribunal ruled that service tax is payable for cleaning services to railways, invalidated the Commissioner's decision, deemed extended limitation inapplicable, and affirmed the inclusion of service tax in the gross amount.
š šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: Prabhakar Enterprises vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Bharuch š¦š²šæšš¶š°š² š§š®š šš½š½š²š®š¹ š”š¼. 11916 of 2016 š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 24 January 2024
This ruling clarifies the tax liability for cleaning services provided to Indian Railways and addresses issues related to the limitation period and the gross amount charged, including service tax.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own