Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

about 1 month ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—”š—µš—ŗš—²š—±š—®š—Æš—®š—± š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—”š—±š—·š˜‚š˜€š˜š—ŗš—²š—»š˜ š—¼š—³ š—˜š˜…š—°š—²š˜€š˜€ š—§š—®š˜… šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—暝—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: "Adjustment of excess tax paid towards future tax liability is valid when appropriately documented and informed by contractual obligations."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: Larsen & Toubro Limited š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Was the adjustment of excess service tax paid valid? š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š˜†: Contract with M/s VISA Power Ltd. included supply and service portions.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal upheld L&T's adjustment of excess tax payment, emphasizing that contract terms are binding if lawful. Under Rules 6(4A) and 6(4B) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994, the adjustment was valid, with no dispute on the total advance. The appeal was allowed, validating tax adjustments.

š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: Larsen & Toubro Limited vs. Commissioner of Central Excise & ST, Vadodara š—¦š—˜š—„š—©š—œš—–š—˜ š—§š—”š—« š—”š—½š—½š—²š—®š—¹ š—”š—¼. 13774 of 2014-DB š—¢š—暝—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 08 June 2023 šŸ“œ This decision confirms that excess service tax payments can be adjusted against future liabilities when based on valid contractual directions.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own