Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

8 months ago

•View on X

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—”š—µš—ŗš—²š—±š—®š—Æš—®š—±: š—”š—¼ š—œš—»š˜š—²š—æš—²š˜€š˜ š—¼š—» š—£š—æš—²ā€“š—±š—²š—½š—¼š˜€š—¶š˜ š— š—®š—±š—² š—¶š—» š—œš—»š—¾š˜‚š—¶š—æš˜† š—®š—»š—± š—œš—»š˜ƒš—²š˜€š˜š—¶š—“š—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—» š—•š—²š—³š—¼š—æš—² 2014 šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—æš—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: Pre-deposit made in 2007 isn't eligible for interest, as 2014 provisions apply only to post-amendment deposits. Appeal dismissed.

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—”š—½š—½š—²š—¹š—¹š—®š—»š˜: Ishwar Construction Company š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Whether the appellant is entitled to interest on the refund of pre-deposit made in 2007?

šŸ”‘ š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that since the ₹25 Lakh pre-deposit was made in 2007, before the 2014 amendment to Sections 35F/35FF, interest was not applicable. The Circular issued in 2014, allowing interest on refunds, applied only to deposits made after the amendments, and thus, the interest claim was denied.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—æš—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: Ishwar Construction Company Vs C.C.E.-Kutch (Gandhidham) š—¢š—æš—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 09 February 2023 šŸ“œ No interest on pre-deposits made in 2007; 2014 Circular applies only to deposits post-amendment, not appellant's case.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on X

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own