
Abhishek Raja "Ram"
about 1 year ago
โขView on X
๐๐๐ฆ๐ง๐๐ง ๐๐ต๐บ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ฎ๐ฑ: ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ต๐ถ๐ป๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ฎ๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐บ๐ผ๐๐ป๐๐ ๐๐ผ ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐๐ณ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฒ; ๐ง๐ต๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ต๐ผ๐น๐ฑ ๐๐ ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฝ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ฝ๐ฝ๐น๐ถ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ผ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ ๐ข ๐ง๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐๐ป๐ฎ๐น'๐ ๐๐ฒ๐น๐ฑ: Machining of castings is manufacturing, exempt from BAS; renting services fall below threshold exemption, no service tax liability.
๐๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐: ๐๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐น๐น๐ฎ๐ป๐: Ramaben Parmar performed machining job work and rented premises, facing service tax demands for both job work and renting. ๐๐๐๐๐ฒ: Is the appellant liable to pay service tax for job work activities and renting of immovable property?
โ๏ธ ๐๐๐ฑ๐ด๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐: Machining of castings is considered "manufacture" under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, exempting it from Business Auxiliary Service (BAS) tax. Additionally, after excluding job work value, the rental income falls below the threshold exemption limit, making service tax demands for both activities unsustainable.
๐๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ๐๐ฎ๐ถ๐น๐: ๐ง๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ: Ramaben Parmar vs. C.S.T.-Service Tax โ Ahmedabad ๐ข๐ฟ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ: 01 March 2023 ๐This ruling underscores the importance of differentiating between manufacturing activities and service provisions, while also highlighting the correct application of exemption thresholds.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own