Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

about 1 year ago

โ€ขView on X

๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—”๐—ง ๐—”๐—ต๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ: ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—”๐—บ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐˜๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜‚๐—ณ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฒ; ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ผ๐—น๐—ฑ ๐—˜๐˜…๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—”๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐Ÿ“ข ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น'๐˜€ ๐—›๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฑ: Machining of castings is manufacturing, exempt from BAS; renting services fall below threshold exemption, no service tax liability.

๐Ÿ”๐—™๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€: ๐—”๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜: Ramaben Parmar performed machining job work and rented premises, facing service tax demands for both job work and renting. ๐—œ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฒ: Is the appellant liable to pay service tax for job work activities and renting of immovable property?

โš–๏ธ ๐—๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜: Machining of castings is considered "manufacture" under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, exempting it from Business Auxiliary Service (BAS) tax. Additionally, after excluding job work value, the rental income falls below the threshold exemption limit, making service tax demands for both activities unsustainable.

๐Ÿ“œ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐——๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—น๐˜€: ๐—ง๐—ถ๐˜๐—น๐—ฒ: Ramaben Parmar vs. C.S.T.-Service Tax โ€“ Ahmedabad ๐—ข๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ: 01 March 2023 ๐Ÿ“œThis ruling underscores the importance of differentiating between manufacturing activities and service provisions, while also highlighting the correct application of exemption thresholds.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on X

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own