Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

over 1 year ago

•View on š•

š—–š—®š—¹š—°š˜‚š˜š˜š—® š—›š—¶š—“š—µ š—–š—¼š˜‚š—æš˜ š—§š—æš—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—”š—½š—½š—²š—®š—¹š˜€ š—•š—²š˜†š—¼š—»š—± š—–š—¼š—»š—±š—¼š—»š—®š—Æš—¹š—² š—£š—²š—æš—¶š—¼š—±. šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—æš—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š˜€š˜š—®š˜š—²š—±: "The Commissioner (Appeals) has no power to condone the delay beyond 30 days / 90 days."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: M/s. LGW Ltd. š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Appeals filed after 43, 40, and 37 months, exceeding the three-month condonable period under Section 85(3) of the Finance Act. š—£š—æš—¼š—°š—²š—²š—±š—¶š—»š—“š˜€: The Commissioner (Appeals) dismissed the appeals due to excessive delay.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—ŗš—²š—»š˜ (šŸ®šŸ® š——š—²š—°š—²š—ŗš—Æš—²š—æ šŸ®šŸ¬šŸ®šŸÆ): The Tribunal upheld the dismissal, affirming that no authority can condone delays beyond the statutory period.

š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—æš—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s. LGW Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Service Tax & Central Excise, Kolkata š——š—®š˜š—²: 22 December 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling emphasizes strict compliance with appeal timelines and the limitations on condoning delays.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on š•

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own