Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024
about 1 month ago
š° šš¼šŗšÆš®š šš¶š“šµ šš¼ššæš š„šš¹š¶š»š“: š©š¼š¹šš»šš®šæš šš²š½š¼šš¶š šØš»š±š²šæ š¦š²š°šš¶š¼š» š³šÆ(š±) šš°š°š²š½šš²š± š®š š£šæš²-šš²š½š¼šš¶š š³š¼šæ šš½š½š²š®š¹ š¢ In a significant judgment, the Bombay High Court confirmed that deposits made "under protest" under Section 73(5) of the GST Act can be counted as pre-deposits for filing an appeal under Section 107. The ruling reinforces that procedural or technical requirements cannot obstruct the right to appeal.
š šš®š°šš šš®šš² š§š¶šš¹š²: Vinod Metal vs State of Maharashtra šš®šš² š”š¼: WP (L) 17026/2023 šš®šš²: 18-July-2023
š§š¶šŗš²š¹š¶š»š² & ššššš²š: The case focused on whether a deposit made voluntarily "under protest" as per Section 73(5) could be adjusted to fulfill the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under Section 107(6) for an appeal. The petitioner argued that this voluntary deposit was eligible to count as the required pre-deposit, despite procedural guidelines suggesting otherwise.
ā šš¼ššæš š¢šÆšš²šæšš®šš¶š¼š»š: The court underscored that any voluntary deposit under Section 73(5) should be considered in the overall tax assessment and cannot be dismissed based on technical grounds. It further stated that a voluntary payment is subject to the taxpayer's contentions and should be counted toward compliance if demanded as a condition for filing an appeal under Section 107(6).
ā ššš±š“šŗš²š»š: The Bombay High Court ruled that the voluntary deposit made "under protest" must be included as part of the mandatory pre-deposit for appeal compliance under Section 107(6). This ruling strengthens the principle that procedural or technical details should not defeat the statutory right to appeal.
š ššŗš½š¹š¶š°š®šš¶š¼š»š: This ruling establishes that deposits made under Section 73(5) are integral to tax compliance and may fulfill pre-deposit requirements, safeguarding the taxpayer's substantive rights against procedural barriers. š§š²š®šŗ šš¦š§š½š®š»š®š°š²š® 7503031378
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own