Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

over 1 year ago

โ€ขView on ๐•

๐Ÿ“ฐ ๐—”๐—น๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ ๐—›๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด: Violation of Natural Justice in GST Case

๐Ÿ“ข The Allahabad High Court quashed orders passed under Section 74 of the U.P. GST Act, ruling that the petitioner was denied a fair opportunity to respond to the allegations, which is a violation of natural justice.

๐Ÿ” ๐—™๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€: ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ถ๐˜๐—น๐—ฒ: Lari Almira House vs State of Uttar Pradesh ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ก๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ: Writ Tax No. 1569 & 1570 of 2022 ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ: 12-Apr-2023

๐—œ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฒ: The petitioner challenged the original order dated 24.01.2022, alleging that it was passed ex-parte based solely on a report by the Special Investigation Branch (SIB), which was not provided to the petitioner. Additionally, the appeal against the original order was dismissed as being beyond the prescribed limitation period.

๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด๐˜€: The petitioner argued that they were not given the opportunity to respond to the SIB report, which violated their right to a fair hearing under Section 75(4) of the U.P. GST Act. The appeal dismissal was also contested, but the appellate authority rejected the appeal on the ground of limitation.

โš– ๐—๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜: The High Court quashed the original order, holding that the departmentโ€™s failure to provide the petitioner with a copy of the SIB report violated the principles of natural justice. However, the appellate authorityโ€™s dismissal of the appeal on the ground of limitation was upheld, with the court finding no error in the decision.

๐Ÿ“œ This ruling reinforces the importance of following due process and upholding the right to a fair hearing under the GST law, while maintaining strict adherence to procedural timelines. Team GSTpanacea 7503031378

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on ๐•

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own