Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024
about 1 month ago
๐๐น๐น๐ฎ๐ต๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐๐ถ๐ด๐ต ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ ๐ฅ๐๐น๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ง๐ฎ๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐ฑ๐๐ผ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ ๐ข ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ ๐ฟ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ฑ: "Advocates are exempted from paying service tax, and it would be harassment to call them to prove that they are practicing advocates. The Commissioner, GST, is directed to issue clear directions that no notices regarding payment of service tax/GST are issued to the lawyers."
๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐: ๐ฃ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ: Pankaj Khare, practicing advocate ๐๐๐๐๐ฒ: The petitioner, a practicing advocate, argued that per Notification dated 20.06.2012, individual advocates are exempt from service tax for services provided to business entities in the taxable territory. Despite this exemption, an order was issued assessing service tax and levying tax and interest on the petitioner.
โ๏ธ ๐๐๐ฑ๐ด๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐: The Divisional Bench of the Hon'ble High Court noted that several members of the Bar had received similar notices, creating unnecessary harassment for practicing advocates who are exempt from service tax and GST. The Court directed the GST Commissioner to issue a clear directive to the GST Commissionerate in Lucknow to ensure that no notices regarding service tax/GST payment are sent to lawyers who are exempt from such taxes. The writ petition was allowed.
๐ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ป๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป: ๐ง๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ: Pankaj Khare vs. Union of India Thru. Secy. Deptt. of Custom and CGST, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi, and Others ๐ข๐ฟ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ: 07 June 2023 ๐This ruling affirms that practicing advocates are exempt from service tax, and any notices issued to them demanding tax payment are unwarranted.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own