Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024
about 1 month ago
๐ฐ ๐๐น๐น๐ฎ๐ต๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐๐ถ๐ด๐ต ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ ๐ฅ๐๐น๐ถ๐ป๐ด: ๐ก๐ผ๐ป-๐๐๐ฏ๐บ๐ถ๐๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐น๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ป๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ป๐ฑ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐ฆ๐ง ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ด๐ถ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ฎ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ๐น๐น๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ข Non-submission of a reply is not sufficient grounds for registration cancellation.
๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐: ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ง๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ: ๐ ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ต ๐๐ผ๐ป๐๐๐ฟ๐๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ ๐จ๐ป๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ป๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฎ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐: Allahabad High Court ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ก๐๐บ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฟ: Writ Tax No. 39 of 2023 ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ: 17-Feb-2023
๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ธ๐ด๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ป๐ฑ: The petitioner, Meerarch Construction, a sole proprietorship owned by Ms. Archana Singh, is engaged in civil work contracts and was registered under the GST Act. The firm had failed to file GST returns, leading to a Show Cause Notice (SCN) on 02-Jun-2021, which directed the petitioner to respond within seven working days. The petitioner contended that they did not receive the SCN in time and therefore could not submit a reply within the stipulated period. Subsequently, an order was passed canceling the petitionerโs GST registration. On 04-Jan-2023, the petitioner filed an appeal against the cancellation order, which was dismissed by the appellate authority due to delay.
โ ๐๐๐ฑ๐ด๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐: The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that non-submission of a reply is not, by itself, a valid ground for canceling GST registration. The court referenced a similar ruling in Technosun India Pvt. Limited, Lucknow vs Union of India, where it was held that non-reply to an SCN, due to extenuating circumstances like the death of a parent or COVID-19 restrictions, does not justify cancellation.
๐ ๐ง๐ต๐ถ๐ ๐ฟ๐๐น๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ถ๐ป๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ฒs that procedural delays or the inability to respond should not lead to punitive cancellation of GST registration, allowing businesses a fair opportunity to rectify procedural lapses. ๐ง๐ฒ๐ฎ๐บ ๐๐ฆ๐ง๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ฎ ๐ 7503031378
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own