Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

about 1 month ago

โ€ขView on Twitter

๐Ÿ“ฐ ๐—”๐—น๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ ๐—›๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด: ๐—ก๐—ผ๐—ป-๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐—บ๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—น๐˜† ๐—–๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—•๐—ฒ ๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—š๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—–๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐Ÿ“ข Non-submission of a reply is not sufficient grounds for registration cancellation.

๐Ÿ” ๐—™๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€: ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ถ๐˜๐—น๐—ฒ: ๐— ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐˜ƒ๐˜€ ๐—จ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฎ ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜: Allahabad High Court ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ก๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ: Writ Tax No. 39 of 2023 ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ: 17-Feb-2023

๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—•๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ: The petitioner, Meerarch Construction, a sole proprietorship owned by Ms. Archana Singh, is engaged in civil work contracts and was registered under the GST Act. The firm had failed to file GST returns, leading to a Show Cause Notice (SCN) on 02-Jun-2021, which directed the petitioner to respond within seven working days. The petitioner contended that they did not receive the SCN in time and therefore could not submit a reply within the stipulated period. Subsequently, an order was passed canceling the petitionerโ€™s GST registration. On 04-Jan-2023, the petitioner filed an appeal against the cancellation order, which was dismissed by the appellate authority due to delay.

โš– ๐—๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜: The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that non-submission of a reply is not, by itself, a valid ground for canceling GST registration. The court referenced a similar ruling in Technosun India Pvt. Limited, Lucknow vs Union of India, where it was held that non-reply to an SCN, due to extenuating circumstances like the death of a parent or COVID-19 restrictions, does not justify cancellation.

๐Ÿ“œ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฐ๐—ฒs that procedural delays or the inability to respond should not lead to punitive cancellation of GST registration, allowing businesses a fair opportunity to rectify procedural lapses. ๐—ง๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—บ ๐—š๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ ๐Ÿ“ž 7503031378

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own