Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024
about 2 months ago
š° šš¹š¹š®šµš®šÆš®š± šš¶š“šµ šš¼ššæš š„šš¹š¶š»š“: šš®š»š°š²š¹š¹š®šš¶š¼š» š¼š³ šš¦š§ š„š²š“š¶šššæš®šš¶š¼š» š¼š³ šš¼š“šš šš¶šæšŗ š¤šš®ššµš²š±
š¢ The court held, "The cancellation of GST registration, based on assumptions without giving an opportunity for a hearing, violates Section 29(2) of the GST Act."
š šš®š°šš: šš®šš² š§š¶šš¹š²: Star Metal Company vs Additional Commissioner Grade-2 šš®šš² š”ššŗšÆš²šæ: Writ Tax No. 397/2023 šš®šš²: 19-May-2023
ššššš²: On September 27, 2019, a survey was conducted at the business premises of the petitioner, Star Metal Company. The authorities found that the business location was not as disclosed in the GST registration. On December 1, 2020, the GST registration of the firm was cancelled, declaring it "bogus." The petitioner filed for revocation of this cancellation, which was rejected in March 2021. Additionally, a show cause notice was issued in April 2021, despite the rejection of the revocation application. The petitioner challenged these orders, arguing that the process violated Section 29(2) of the GST Act and that no opportunity for a hearing was provided.
ā ššš±š“šŗš²š»š: The Allahabad High Court quashed the cancellation of the GST registration and all subsequent orders, holding that the process was flawed. The Court emphasized that cancellation under Section 29(2) requires specific conditions and an opportunity for a hearing, both of which were ignored in this case. The issuance of the notice in April 2021 after the rejection of the revocation application was also improper.
š The Court allowed the writ petition and provided the GST authorities the liberty to issue a fresh notice, adhering to legal requirements under Section 29(2), to be decided on merit without being influenced by earlier observations. Team GSTpanacea 7503031378
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own